David Cocks Q C
shunned his son tried to have him aborted by putting pressure on his young orphan pupil and scorn Sir Derek Spencer through his champagne and fox hunting agitation when told his son a baby in agony for every breath was on a life support machine "I couldnt care less" he said more concerned with drinking his champagne and anxious to get off to his country estate and get on his horse to persue foxes for sport,the fox could die and his sons life "He is nothing to me " he said with cruel arrogance to the stund Solicitor General the humane and good Sir Derek.David Cock mother caleed Sir derek "a very naughty boy " for sticking up for her grand son who she refused to see ever " my step grandchildren are very important to me i love them as much as my grandchildren but not David's son because he said I mustnt."

He said "I couldnt care less" when Sir Derek Spencer Solicitor General told him his son was on a life support machine "Ill never see him and no-one can make me.I couldnt care less."as he finished his champagne and went off in his big car to his country estate to fox hunt on his big ginger horse.He denied paternity on oath though he confessed the years affair with his young orphan pupil to Derek his cruelty to his son to child shocked Sir Derek a moral human being.

"The peasants of the Asturias believe that in every litter of wolves there is one dog, which is killed by the mother, lest on growing up it should devour the other little ones. Give a human face to this dog son of a wolf, and you will have Javert."
"He would have arrested his father if escaping from the
galleys, and denounced his mother for violating her ticket of leave. And he would have done it with that sort of interior satisfaction that springs from virtue.... a fierce honesty, a marble-hearted informer, Brutus united with Vidocq."

Hugo portrays Jean Valjean as a victim in Les Miserables, and characterizes Javert as a figurehead of authority: the evil force responsible for Valjean's despair and broken spirit while he is imprisoned. As the quote above illustrates, Hugo definitely felt that authority unfairly targeted the impoverished, like Valjean. But who is this policeman exactly, and how is authority characterized within him? His name is Javert...Javert is portrayed as a ruthless, totalitarian force in Les Miserables.
For example, when he drags Fantine out of the town square, kicking and screaming, he pulls her away and says absolutely nothing. Despite her pleas for "mercy", his decision is unwavering and final. He has no pity for the woman with the child,but at least it is not his own child surely something would stirr in him some pity

(Illustration from Les Miserables)

The evil Javert hounds Valjean even as David Cocks Q C hounded the mother of his child for refusing an abortion and then stated he couldnt care less if his child died when Sir Derek Spencer Solicitor General told him his son was on a life support machine "Ill never see him and no-one can make me.I couldnt care less."as he finished his champagne and went off in his big car to his country estate to fox hunt on his big ginger horse.He denied paternity on oath though he confessed the years affair with his young orphan pupil to Derek his cruelty to his son to child shocked Sir Derek a moral human being.
Just as Valjean David Cocks was ruthless BUT THE DIFFERENCE IS Valjean WAS NOT RUTHLESS TO HIS OWN FLESH AND BLOOD HIS OWN CHILD
David Cocks QC broke the mother's heart as she struggled against extreme poverty to feed and house her child,she had no money after he threw her out and tramp the streets even when the child was on a life support machine his heart was stone "I couldnt care less if he dies"he said to Sir Derek Spencer Solicitor General as a shocked Sir Derek told a stunned court,but David Cocks gathered the cruel elite around him,those who did not think using the power as a pupil master and acting improperly towards her making her pregnat and abandoning the mother and child without a home or a penny piece was immoral and cruel,that was an age when womens rights as human beings were not given the care as now and the child meant nothing.Only Sir Derek,Bill Marshall(later Attorney Gerneral to Hong Kong and the amazing Sir Nicholas Wilson QC later to become a Supreme Court Judge,these men had morality in a place where David Cocks cruelty and self rightous self regard dazzled the world of power hungry cowtailing elites.Just as Valjean David Cocks was ruthless BUT THE DIFFERENCE IS Valjean WAS NOT RUTHLESS TO HIS OWN FLESH AND BLOOD HIS OWN CHILD
David Cocks Q C threw his young orphan pupil out of chamber for refusing an abortion even as Fantine was thrown out of the factory for having a child to support. She was also thrown out of her tiny one room and with a baby in her arms had to walk the sreet looking for a room while David Cocks QC had two large expensive homes..He used fear and intimidation to terrify the mother threatening her "yoiuve wrecked my life(for not having an abortion)if I see you again Ill wreck yours"which he then did pursuing her and the child endlessly through courts,trying to turn him out of his the childs private school into a rubbish sate school,while David Cocks had had a silver spoon and the best schools and university that money could buy.He persued her persued her through court and threats to try to make the child have no maintenance to tryand reduce it to stop his private education,he was never allowed to see his granparents though the mother was an orphan ,he was never even given a christmas card while David Cocks marred again and spoilt his grown up step children and his grown up son with love and time his own child he exclude and stone walled refusing even to read a letter from the mother requesting him to help his son,he lived in glory while she and his child lived in poverty she was young he middle aged and powerful he her teacher he one of the richest men in England she one of the poorest she looked after his child alone he gave her not one penny for herself and only £16.24P A WEEK,deducting the tax from the £25 the court had ordered he even denied aternity on oath,saw his mother every week end when stayed 3 nights a week but never saw his son as a child,an infant,just frightened and intimidated the mother so she was terrified of his power and couldnt raise a voice because he was a great power in the proffession and she a powerless newcomer who had fought to become a barrister,but he laughed and humiliated her called her "old fish face " and ruined the child's childhood and her youth.Not one kind word never baby sat just swanned round his his robes saying his son was of the lower order and not fit to go to Hill House where the mother sent him,where the Queen had sent Prince
Charles.





David Cocks Q C Javert !
ReplyDeleteShameful of David Cocks Q C and then pretending he fought to see his child he fought to avoid it what he fought for was to exclude his son from a decent home a quiet child hood inclusion in his father hearth and home,he derided him with exclusion impoverised him with no money for the first year of his life then a miserly £16.24pence a week,refused to see him,telling the court he'd think about it saying he didnt want access,marrying his best friends wife and spoiling them and loving them to bits this afterhaving refused to help and see his son when as a baby he was on a life sport machine struggling with every breath and now he pretends that he wanted access while secretly writing to Robin Cocks "there is no future in seeing"his son.He doesnt even send his son a card on his birthday while giving the groom who looks after his horse a gold broach bar to wear,he fought hook line and sinker to diminish and humiliate the mother of his child his young orphan pupil because she refused to abort his child who is shameful who is a disgrace to humanhood a disgrace to father hood one of the richest cruellest fathers who has never hugged his child kissed him ,but excluded and humiliates him,even denying paternity on oath,accusing her of having given life to his child against his wishes when he wanted him killed before birth,and then givining all his paternal love and attention to hi middleaged step children who he had nutured with afftion since their birth .Has this man no shame no manhood and he decries the mother for not be totally suppressed by his devious bullying he doesnt care tupence about his son just himself his glorious self and those who will support his ego by telling him like a baby its not his fault.He doesnt see his son becuase he endorse the evil that allows some men or low paternal morality to cruely reject their sons.Jarvert!
David Cocks q c Javert indeed
ReplyDeleteDavid Cocks QCnever sent a xmas card to his son all his life and sneered saying "I couldnt care less"to Sir Derek Spencer when his son was a baby on a life support machine and wouldnt visit him and when on the life support machine and the mother his young orphan pupil was sleeping on the floor had no money he wont give her or his son one kind word or one penny peice.He just carried on drinking and then went off to hunt and kill foxes at his country estate
ReplyDeletehis order for her to have an abortion as he told the court "for the sake of my career."
No room at the inn for David Cocks QC youngest child.
BUT ROOM AT THE INN FOR EVERYONE ELSE
NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO SEE HIS GRANDPARENTS ALL HIS LIFE
NO XMAS CARD NO HUG NO ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF HIS SON'S HUMANITY HE SOUGHT TO DAMAGE HIS SONS CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND SELF ESTEEM
FURIOUS WITH THE CHILD HAD NOT BEEN ABORTED.NO ROOM AT THE INN.
EVEN RALPH NICKLEBY IN Nicholas Nickleby Ralph schemes to deliberately hurt and humiliate Nicholas; but the only man Ralph ends up destroying is himself. When it is revealed that Smike was his son, BUT RALPH AT LEAST HAD SHAME DAVID COCKS HAS NO SHAME AT HIS CRUEL CONUCT TO HIS SON DEMANDING THE ELITE SNEER NOT WHAT HE HAS DONE AGAINST HUMANITY JUSTICE AND MORALITY OF HIS SON ,BUT AT HIS SONS EXCLUSION .ALAN BENNETT PLAY WRITER CALLS HIM A COMPLETE UNCARING BASTARD,BRUCE KENT SAYS WHAT SORT OF MAN WOULD CREATE A CHILD AND DUMP HIM,LINDA DOBBS Q C SAYS HE DOESNT LISTEN TO A WORD WHEN SHE ADMONISHED HIM FOR HIS CONDUCT TO HIS CHILD ,SIR DEREK SPENCER WAS SHOCKED AND APPALLED AT HIS CRUELTY WHEN HE TOLD HIM"I COULDNT CARE LESS IF MYSON DIES"WHEN THE CHILD WAS ON A LIFE SUPORT MACHINE IN AONY STRUGGLING WITH EVERY BREATH.RICHARD E GRANT SAID HIS FATHER WASNT AS BAD BUT THESE CRUEL FATHER ARE UNABLE TO CHANGE
COMPLETETLY SELF ABSORBED ,THE BISHOP OF LONDON PRAYED FOR DAVID COCKS REDEEMPTION,ROBERT GRAVES SAID NO MAN CAN LIVE WITH SUCH CRUELTY UNLESS THEY ARE NOT FULLY MORALLY HUMAN EVEN OUR QUEEN DEMANDS WE ALL LOVE AND CARE FOR OUR CHILDREN ESPECIALLY AT CHRISTMAS
NO ROOM AT THE INN NOT BY DAVID COCKS Q C FOR HIS CHILD NO PLACE AT HIS HEARTH OR HIS TABLE
EVEN EBENEZER SCROOGE HAD PITY FOR TINY TIM BUT DAVID COCKS HAS NO LOVE FOR HIS SON EVEN A XMAS CARD OR A XMAS GIFT
HIS OWN FLESH AND BLOOD
THE POPE SAYS ALL CHILDREN A PRECIOUS AND SHOULD BE LOVED SHOULD BE EQUALLY AND TREATED WITH HUMANITY EQUALITY AND JUSTICE
BUT IN DAVID COCKS THERE IS NO ROOM AT THE INN FOR HIS SON NO ROOM AT THE INN
NO JUSTICE OR EQUALITY FOR DAVID COCK'S CHILD
NO XMAS CARD NO GIFT NO LOVE
JUST SPITE AND DISTAIN
NO ROOM AT THE INN FOR DAVID COCKS Q C YOUNGEST CHILD
pretty shameful
ReplyDeleteI saw this " From Private Eye.
ReplyDelete"Hallo !
Brilliant Barrister David Cocks Q , hero of the Roger Levitt fraud trial in which he led for the crown, has been in court again-on his own behalf. Sadly for David whose many admirers hope will soon don a judges robes, the decision went the wrong way.
He was in court over the long standing matter of maintenance for his lovechild, born to his former pupil barrister, Felicity. The original order for maintenance was for £25,from which he decided to deduct tax ,leaving the child with £16.24p a week. After more than a decade the mother applied to increase the maintenance, At Marylebone Magistrates court she applied to have the order increased and for it to extend until the end of the boy’s fulltime education.
Mr Cocks opposed this and appealed to the higher court. Joanna Dobson QC ,submitted that “The father has used his advantageous financial position to engage in litigation which is wholly misguided, which may have had as its purpose the intimidation of the mother.” The High Court Judge hearing the appeal decided to award indemnity costs-the highest level possible-against poor old David!
luckily he is not in the same league as those errant fathers who are pursued by the child support agency. David owns a £500,000 house in North London, a £3000 race horse, and still has a few coppers left over to take part in some modest pheasant-shooting and stag and fox hunting.
Things worked out well for the father able to leave both the mothers of his children and run off with his best friends wife
well met by moonlight oh Horatio