David Cocks Q C stonewalled his son
He said "I couldnt care less" when Sir Derek Spencer Solicitor General told him his son was on a life support machine "Ill never see him and no-one can make me.I couldnt care less."as he finished his champagne and went off in his big car to his country estate to fox hunt on his big ginger horse.He denied paternity on oath though he confessed the years affair with his young orphan pupil to Derek his cruelty to his son to child shocked Sir Derek a moral human being.
"The peasants of the Asturias believe that in every litter of wolves there is one dog, which is killed by the mother, lest on growing up it should devour the other little ones. Give a human face to this dog son of a wolf, and you will have Javert."
"He would have arrested his father if escaping from the
galleys, and denounced his mother for violating her ticket of leave. And he would have done it with that sort of interior satisfaction that springs from virtue.... a fierce honesty, a marble-hearted informer, Brutus united with Vidocq."
Hugo portrays Jean Valjean as a victim in Les Miserables, and characterizes Javert as a figurehead of authority: the evil force responsible for Valjean's despair and broken spirit while he is imprisoned. As the quote above illustrates, Hugo definitely felt that authority unfairly targeted the impoverished, like Valjean. But who is this policeman exactly, and how is authority characterized within him? His name is Javert...Javert is portrayed as a ruthless, totalitarian force in Les Miserables.
For example, when he drags Fantine out of the town square, kicking and screaming, he pulls her away and says absolutely nothing. Despite her pleas for "mercy", his decision is unwavering and final. He has no pity for the woman with the child,but at least it is not his own child surely something would stirr in him some pity
(Illustration from Les Miserables)
The evil Javert hounds Valjean even as David Cocks Q C hounded the mother of his child for refusing an abortion and then stated he couldnt care less if his child died when Sir Derek Spencer Solicitor General told him his son was on a life support machine "Ill never see him and no-one can make me.I couldnt care less."as he finished his champagne and went off in his big car to his country estate to fox hunt on his big ginger horse.He denied paternity on oath though he confessed the years affair with his young orphan pupil to Derek his cruelty to his son to child shocked Sir Derek a moral human being.
Just as Valjean David Cocks was ruthless BUT THE DIFFERENCE IS Valjean WAS NOT RUTHLESS TO HIS OWN FLESH AND BLOOD HIS OWN CHILD
David Cocks QC broke the mother's heart as she struggled against extreme poverty to feed and house her child,she had no money after he threw her out and tramp the streets even when the child was on a life support machine his heart was stone "I couldnt care less if he dies"he said to Sir Derek Spencer Solicitor General as a shocked Sir Derek told a stunned court,but David Cocks gathered the cruel elite around him,those who did not think using the power as a pupil master and acting improperly towards her making her pregnat and abandoning the mother and child without a home or a penny piece was immoral and cruel,that was an age when womens rights as human beings were not given the care as now and the child meant nothing.Only Sir Derek,Bill Marshall(later Attorney Gerneral to Hong Kong and the amazing Sir Nicholas Wilson QC later to become a Supreme Court Judge,these men had morality in a place where David Cocks cruelty and self rightous self regard dazzled the world of power hungry cowtailing elites.Just as Valjean David Cocks was ruthless BUT THE DIFFERENCE IS Valjean WAS NOT RUTHLESS TO HIS OWN FLESH AND BLOOD HIS OWN CHILD
David Cocks Q C threw his young orphan pupil out of chamber for refusing an abortion even as Fantine was thrown out of the factory for having a child to support. She was also thrown out of her tiny one room and with a baby in her arms had to walk the sreet looking for a room while David Cocks QC had two large expensive homes..He used fear and intimidation to terrify the mother threatening her "yoiuve wrecked my life(for not having an abortion)if I see you again Ill wreck yours"which he then did pursuing her and the child endlessly through courts,trying to turn him out of his the childs private school into a rubbish sate school,while David Cocks had had a silver spoon and the best schools and university that money could buy.He persued her persued her through court and threats to try to make the child have no maintenance to tryand reduce it to stop his private education,he was never allowed to see his granparents though the mother was an orphan ,he was never even given a christmas card while David Cocks marred again and spoilt his grown up step children and his grown up son with love and time his own child he exclude and stone walled refusing even to read a letter from the mother requesting him to help his son,he lived in glory while she and his child lived in poverty she was young he middle aged and powerful he her teacher he one of the richest men in England she one of the poorest she looked after his child alone he gave her not one penny for herself and only £16.24P A WEEK,deducting the tax from the £25 the court had ordered he even denied aternity on oath,saw his mother every week end when stayed 3 nights a week but never saw his son as a child,an infant,just frightened and intimidated the mother so she was terrified of his power and couldnt raise a voice because he was a great power in the proffession and she a powerless newcomer who had fought to become a barrister,but he laughed and humiliated her called her "old fish face " and ruined the child's childhood and her youth.Not one kind word never baby sat just swanned round his his robes saying his son was of the lower order and not fit to go to Hill House where the mother sent him,where the Queen had sent Prince
Charles.
The father on purpose broke the mothers heart through cruelty to the child.
Saddness and cruelty
ReplyDeleteGrim
ReplyDeletewhy dint David Cocks Q C wear jumble sale clothes if he thought his child could live on air when he was a baby
ReplyDeletenot nice
ReplyDeletecruelty personifed
ReplyDeleteUTTERLY APALLNG OF DAID COCKS Q C TO TREAT HIS CHLD IN THIS MANNER ANDHIMSELF SO WELL.........
ReplyDeleteI am shocked
ReplyDeleteterrible
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteHow silly can this father be
Not to invite his son to tea
Instead to flounce about his land
Feeling splendid feeling grand
"A fellow never was like me
With limbs so marvelous gait so free,
A pillar of society.
A little cruelty here and there
Makes the boredom less to bear"
His eyes did sparkle,tossed his hair,
"You see the marvellous clothes I wear,
Flung carefully on without a care.
I really am a marvellous toad
I like my cars to hog the road
I like to hoot I like to shout
And leave my little offspring out
Because you see I have to tend
The children of my last best friend
So Tally Ho Ill gallop off
I really am a splendid toff
Ill watch him scrim and wear torn boots
That noise,oh pardon me my hoots,
But please oh please dont think me crass
A relative molecular mass
An angels voice an angels grace
And handsome gait and handsome face
I really am a marvellous toad
So now I'm off to hog the road
They all love me I think you know
From my proud face to little toe
I'm rich and famous wild and free
And what I love is ME ME ME
And now I'm of to have my tea
And if I have a child in pain
Well really that is just my gain
I like to squabble like to hurt
And treat my youngest son like dirt
I play a very cunning plot
And say Im marvellous when Im not
For even I know that its bad
For cruel rejection from a dad
To keep him from my great big farm
To hurt his feelings do him harm
But now I simply must away
To have another splendid day
Ive things to do all good for me
But first of all I'll have my tea.
wHY DOES THE FATHER BEHAVE THIS WAY IS HE AA BT AUTISTIC OR SADISTIC IT IS A PUZZLE IS NOONE STRNG ENOUGH TO OINT OUT HOW IT LOOKS EXCEPT PRHAPS DEREK SPENCER Q C
ReplyDeleteI am astonished that such a man as David Cocks decries himself to be can be so dishonourable and cruel as to treat his son so cruely as indeed could not even be sustained by the villian Javert
ReplyDeleteOh my
ReplyDeleteNot very honourable of David Cocks Q C
ReplyDeleteSad
ReplyDeleteDerek Spencer is indeed a moral man to stand up against such evil enterprise as was cooked up by David Cocks Q C
ReplyDeleteDavid Cocks is his son's peddler of misery,exclusion and misery,even refusing to see him when as a baby he was on a life support machine when Sir Derek Spencer begged him to see his son and help him"I couldnt care less I will never see him and noone can make me "said the proud David Cocks Q C David Cocks Q C made the life of his child as miserable and deprived as he humanly could get away with (I mean £16.24p a week for 12 years)while flaunting his power and wealth and luxury life style and lying about his paternity and excluding his son from house and home,how evil can you get yet he puts himself out as the victim of fate and those who help get glorious rewards and favours,has this man this father no balls even Chris Huhne in the depthof his despair had human feeling for his son but David Cocks Q C not an ounce of compassion even when his son as a young child was in agony on a life support machine he just went of hunting,he the 6th richestprosecuting barrister according to Hansard giving his child only nickles and dimes and not even a moment of his tme and /or a Christmas card,but loads to his middle aged step children who have always had open access to him his love and his huge farm and homes and hearths.Is this humanity justice equality no shame no compassion just the comfort of self pity and using his power to silence any mention of justice or compasion except the world changes and now childrenmatter and cruelty and exclusion are seen for the cruel chaos they are.Even the villian Javert wouldnt act like this to his own child but David Cocks Q C he culdnt careless being above the human morality of fatherhood hes always sorry for himself pretends nothing is fault that he can act with any cruelty and power tht besets his latent desires for cruelty
ReplyDeleteDavid Cocks Q C practices ostracism against his son since prebirth and even said "I coudlnt care less and I will never see him and no one can make me"when Sir Derek Spencer the Solicitor General told him his litlle baby son was on a life support machine in agony fighting for his life with every beath.while he finished his champagne and went off to hunt foxes,he hugely rich the young orphan mother almost pennyless,eventually for 12 years he gave £16.24pence a week despite being the 6th riches prosecutor in England according to the House of Commons earnong hundred of thousands of pounds a year,she trown out of chambers because she refused an abortion at 3 months pregnant and he pretended it wasnt his child though telling Sir Derek Spencer Q C "I made my pupil pregnant.He then denied paternity on oath ans sir derek nobly and with great courage against the spite power wealth and might he a senior member of the Bar she an orphan and a pupil and alone in life living in one room with a broken window and no money.Ofcousres David Cocks Q C tried to destroy and silence the mother "I will wreck your life if I see you again."and now he tries to be the vicim never seeing his son never trying to never sending him a birthday card and forbidding him to see his granparents and his brother Dr Harry Cocks who he loved and spoilt and his middle aged step children .He refusses to take responsibility to the two women he left with children and acts like a victim as if his act of cruelty and neglect were not of his deliberate cruelty and making,whho in their right mind would exclude and ostracise their own child try to force the mother to abort exclude the child shun the mother insult her to her face and call her fish face to some one who she had introduced for pupillage plotted to ward his own child to stop him having a good education "misusing the jurisdition of the court"who called him "a hard and determined man and an uncaring father.
ReplyDeleteand then winges like a poor victim why carrying on the exclusion of his dearly begotten son.I ask you fairy land or what.
Javert indeed
ReplyDeletewith corrections
ReplyDeleteWhat crow would try to say David Cocks will see his son when he wont just another lie in a web of lies he wrote to Robin Cocks saying "Ther is no future" in seeing his son because his mother believed in wind farms and David Cocks(NOTa sensitive whimp)said he DIDNOT and was sensitive to that differenciation,NOT SENTITIVE TO THE FACT HE TOLD SIR DEREK Spencer Q C SOLICITOR GENERAL WHEN HIS SON WAS ON A LIFE SUPPORT MACHINE "I couldnt care less if he dies I will never see him and no one can make me."Not sensitive when he refused to see his son in a play,rather went to see his second wifes parents who had a cold,not sensitive when he told the mother "you dont have the guts to kill yourself" when she was pregnant,not sensitive when HE tried to make HER abort his child for the sake of his first marriage,not sensitive when Robert Woods his best friend had a breakdown and was hospitalised when he ran off with his wife,not sensitive when his first wifes solicitor said she had never known a harder man in the the first wifes divorce case where he was charged with adultery, not sensitive when he never saw his son despite Derek Spencer QC, Nicholas Wilson QC Bill Masrshall,Q C AG of Hong Kong begged him to oh no just sensitive to his own fragile feelings,not sensitive when he gave his second wife his farm to stop his son getting anything in his will but kept his farm business to off set money earned from windfarms
Shameful oh yes who indeed is shameful and found so by all the courts including the High Court Family divsion where they called him "a hard and determined man.an uncaring father" " a father who didnt even know the date of his sons birthday" and refused and still refuses to see his son but hadnt refused to run off with his first wife's best friend causing his first wife agony. agony,bitterness and anger and spite and fury have caused all these deviant cruelties for how else could a man be so inhuman to the human rights of his child and instead of standing up to the thumb he's under the evil that posses his soul, rights his wrongs embraces his son
The universe knows the truth,no matter how bareface , contumelious, scurrilous and destructive the abuse is to that mother who raised his child alone and how cruel and abusive the exclusion to hearth and home to his son, if he wanted to hug his son send him a birthday or any day card to his son or hug him he could but he just fences words to aviod and to hide the truth of his cruety and exclusion because all he cares about is how he looks it would seem.The universe awaits but can David Cocks understand the concept of kindness and humanity to his son.
Only God knows and I doubt He has many high expectations
I know there exist people in the world who can persue through unholyness and cruelty but your own son and to abandon him from birth,what can a man feel like or be like to do this Javert ideed,indeed and perhaps word
ReplyDeleteDavid Cocks Q C Javert !
ReplyDeleteShameful of David Cocks Q C and then pretending he fought to see his child he fought to avoid it what he fought for was to exclude his son from a decent home a quiet child hood inclusion in his father hearth and home,he derided him with exclusion impoverised him with no money for the first year of his life then a miserly £16.24pence a week,refused to see him,telling the court he'd think about it saying he didnt want access,marrying his best friends wife and spoiling them and loving them to bits this afterhaving refused to help and see his son when as a baby he was on a life sport machine struggling with every breath and now he pretends that he wanted access while secretly writing to Robin Cocks "there is no future in seeing"his son.He doesnt even send his son a card on his birthday while giving the groom who looks after his horse a gold broach bar to wear,he fought hook line and sinker to diminish and humiliate the mother of his child his young orphan pupil because she refused to abort his child who is shameful who is a disgrace to humanhood a disgrace to father hood one of the richest cruellest fathers who has never hugged his child kissed him ,but excluded and humiliates him,even denying paternity on oath,accusing her of having given life to his child against his wishes when he wanted him killed before birth,and then givining all his paternal love and attention to hi middleaged step children who he had nutured with afftion since their birth .Has this man no shame no manhood and he decries the mother for not be totally suppressed by his devious bullying he doesnt care tupence about his son just himself his glorious self and those who will support his ego by telling him like a baby its not his fault.He doesnt see his son becuase he endorse the evil that allows some men or low paternal morality to cruely reject their sons.Jarvert!
Jonathan Goldberg is a better more humane father and human being in my opinion than someone who abuses a pupil when he is in a postion of trust in relation to her by making her pregnant, abandoning her and her career (which she fought so hard to attain) and deserting the child when born and denying paternity on oath (the court found him guilty "without a doubt"and the mother to be utterly truthful,Sir Derek gave evidence) his own baby child then denies paternity on oath despite telling Sir Derek "!'ve made my pupil pregnant," well he is always showing his own true colour with consistency,kind to those who suck up to him irresponsible to his yopungest child marvelously assiduously careful towards his own comforts, rattling on about his fan club and how he's adores but cruel as hunger menacing to his own son who he left in agony as a baby on a lifesupport machine while he went hunting telling the appalled Sir Derek Spencer Solicitor General "I couldnt care less if he dies he is nothing to me "as he drank his champagne and went off to his country estate to go for a week end of pleasure and hunting innocent animals who had never hurt him for yet another bloodlust sport,hurting his own son greviously and the young mother his young orphaned pupil who he breached his proffessional duty of care to, by making her pregnant,simply didnt satisfy the blood lust enough so lets hound the innocent little animals as well.David Cocks Q C is an utterly appalling father with not an ounce or a semblance of remorse of feeling for anyoneone or anything but his own feelings desires interests and capacities.WHY THE CRUELTY WHY THE RAGE WHY ABANDON HIS OWN CHILD TO THE CRUELTIES OF LIFE AND MOCK IN THE FACE OF GOD MORALITY AND HUMANITY urged on by those who would define him in terms of their own interests.
ReplyDeletePoor child to have David Cocks QC as a father as he is so cruel heartless and relentlessly ruthless and unfeeling to his child from birth,to one child the youngest but treats his other children middle aged and step children middle aged like gold dust from birth giving them all love presents attention company hugs and kisses time energy huge houses and huge gardens(198 acrea estate in town and large houses in London worth millions trips and training in Australia,work contacts,going to their schools and colleges for ceremonies and sports days letting them see their granparents (even though the step children had their own )while he son was denied all these,no garden ,no Christmas cards or presents never allowed to see his grandparents since birth,this man earned £800,000 a year (House of Commons report says £500,000 in prosecution alone) and for almost 12 years paid his son £16 a week .
Wher is the morality where is the humanity.
Only an evil man and an evilfather would say "I will never see him and I couldnt care less" to Sir Derek when his baby son who was in agony for every breath and who he had ruthlessly denied and abandoned from birth,was on a life support machine
where indeed the morality where indeed the humanity
the power is there the supression of good is there the determination to deflect from the political and attack the mother and child because they are more susceptible to being silenced than the morality to the science,a millionaire can crush a young woman his pupil in love with him caring and caring for his chld the politics the morality cannot it sees injustice and cruelty for what it is
David Cocks Q C versus the goodness of Sir Derek Spencer,Jonathen Goldberg and Sir Nicholas Wilson and William Marshall Q C David Cocks Q C versus the goodness of Sir Derek Spencer,Jonathen Goldberg and Sir Nicholas Wilson and William Marshall Q C I know who I choose and I know I believe who God on the Judgement Day will choose when all secrets are revealed
Sad and cruel ofcourse a father even David Cocks QC should have humanity to his son
ReplyDeleteVery sad and nonconformist of the father to have the capacity to void his natural paternal inclinations as other men are prone. Sir Derek Spencer Q C was horrified and shocked at the cruelty of David Cocks Q C and his propensity for self-absorption and vengeance upon a child and the attempt to wound and neglect David Cocks own flesh and blood son in his eagerness to retain his own messianic self-concept. Trying to destroy his own son and defiling the women, the women who for a year he had claimed as his and who had born his child, his pupil in whom her professional welfare was entrusted according to barrister /pupil master rules. Sir Derek gave evidence that David Cocks loathed her for refusing his whim to abort the child he David Cocks was responsible for creating, for the sake of his career. He tried to destroy his child and what had been his woman by choice ,and fury ravished him and his partner because the mother fought for the child' survival as any God fearing Christian mother would and according to the instructions of the law and of morality. The sole motivation for her was the survival of hers and David Cocks Q C's child against the ravishes of his super human self-confidence and desperately weak moral humanity, influence by the crucible of his childhood indulging mother who lavished him with reciprocal adoration where he obtained a distorted concept of paternal morality and responsibilities and enabled him to be a sadist father to his child, with his mother’s approval (who he visited every week end in adulthood yet not his child Brave people told him to see and respect his sons humanity, Sir Nicholas Wilson Q C of the Supreme Court, Sir Derek Spencer Solicitor General and his roommate, Dame Linda Dobbs Q C pupil after the mother Felicity, shocked by his manipulative cruelty, William Marshall Q C who offered much help and was severely damaged by this, many good people gave respect, Robert Graves poet, Tony Benn M P, Helenna Kennedy Q C.
ReplyDeleteDavid Cocks Q C drunk champagne as he went off to hunt Sir Derek told him his infant child was struggling on a life support machine. “I couldn’t care less if he dies he is nothing to do with me and I will never see him and no one can make me."The might of his messianic self-wounded messianic complex having full power believing in his own divine protection that he was chosen to rise above morality and remain in the elites adoration and favour, under some sort of divine protection ,yet in fact exposing his desperately weak moral grasp on universality and how his conduct would be viewed in time historical ,universally in a world without moral distortion which power and elitism temporally exposes sadistic conduct to. He never seeks to see his son but rather seeks to emulate the comfort and positive reinforcement in his relationships which his mother’s indulgence formed in him in the crucible of his developing self as a child and hence a human being .He cannot muster the courage it would require to change his moral stance to defy his current mother substitute and meet his own son and find out the marvellous precious courageous human being he is, so much easier to shuffle about in obedience to the approved structure of those not of his own flesh which he is directed to befall and interactively respond to. Inequality and injustice are the implements and tools of segregation required to shun his own son exclude him from his life house and home yet include all others as it would seem in a nest of privilege and inclusion, yet excluding the power of true happiness in finding the courage of his culture and humanity
Very sad and nonconformist of the father to have the capacity to void his natural paternal inclinations as other men are prone. Sir Derek Spencer Q C was horrified and shocked at the cruelty of David Cocks Q C and his propensity for self-absorption and vengeance upon a child and the attempt to wound and neglect David Cocks own flesh and blood son in his eagerness to retain his own messianic self-concept. Trying to destroy his own son and defiling the women, the women who for a year he had claimed as his and who had born his child, his pupil in whom her professional welfare was entrusted according to barrister /pupil master rules. Sir Derek gave evidence that David Cocks loathed her for refusing his whim to abort the child he David Cocks was responsible for creating, for the sake of his career. He tried to destroy his child and what had been his woman by choice ,and fury ravished him and his partner because the mother fought for the child' survival as any God fearing Christian mother would and according to the instructions of the law and of morality. The sole motivation for her was the survival of hers and David Cocks Q C's child against the ravishes of his super human self-confidence and desperately weak moral humanity, influence by the crucible of his childhood indulging mother who lavished him with reciprocal adoration where he obtained a distorted concept of paternal morality and responsibilities and enabled him to be a sadist father to his child, with his mother’s approval (who he visited every week end in adulthood yet not his child Brave people told him to see and respect his sons humanity, Sir Nicholas Wilson Q C of the Supreme Court, Sir Derek Spencer Solicitor General and his roommate, Dame Linda Dobbs Q C pupil after the mother Felicity, shocked by his manipulative cruelty, William Marshall Q C who offered much help and was severely damaged by this, many good people gave respect, Robert Graves poet, Tony Benn M P, Helenna Kennedy Q C.
ReplyDeleteDavid Cocks Q C drunk champagne as he went off to hunt Sir Derek told him his infant child was struggling on a life support machine. “I couldn’t care less if he dies he is nothing to do with me and I will never see him and no one can make me."The might of his messianic self-wounded messianic complex having full power believing in his own divine protection that he was chosen to rise above morality and remain in the elites adoration and favour, under some sort of divine protection ,yet in fact exposing his desperately weak moral grasp on universality and how his conduct would be viewed in time historical ,universally in a world without moral distortion which power and elitism temporally exposes sadistic conduct to. He never seeks to see his son but rather seeks to emulate the comfort and positive reinforcement in his relationships which his mother’s indulgence formed in him in the crucible of his developing self as a child and hence a human being .He cannot muster the courage it would require to change his moral stance to defy his current mother substitute and meet his own son and find out the marvellous precious courageous human being he is, so much easier to shuffle about in obedience to the approved structure of those not of his own flesh which he is directed to befall and interactively respond to. Inequality and injustice are the implements and tools of segregation required to shun his own son exclude him from his life house and home yet include all others as it would seem in a nest of privilege and inclusion, yet excluding the power of true happiness in finding the courage of his culture and humanity
sad
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteDavid Cocks Q C failed Father:”If parenting sees us at our most loving,civilised and altruistic,then to fail at it is to have slipped off the bottom of the rung ofthe species”
Really mean
ReplyDeleteI saw this " From Private Eye.
ReplyDelete"Hallo !
Brilliant Barrister David Cocks Q , hero of the Roger Levitt fraud trial in which he led for the crown, has been in court again-on his own behalf. Sadly for David whose many admirers hope will soon don a judges robes, the decision went the wrong way.
He was in court over the long standing matter of maintenance for his lovechild, born to his former pupil barrister, Felicity. The original order for maintenance was for £25,from which he decided to deduct tax ,leaving the child with £16.24p a week. After more than a decade the mother applied to increase the maintenance, At Marylebone Magistrates court she applied to have the order increased and for it to extend until the end of the boy’s fulltime education.
Mr Cocks opposed this and appealed to the higher court. Joanna Dobson QC ,submitted that “The father has used his advantageous financial position to engage in litigation which is wholly misguided, which may have had as its purpose the intimidation of the mother.” The High Court Judge hearing the appeal decided to award indemnity costs-the highest level possible-against poor old David!
luckily he is not in the same league as those errant fathers who are pursued by the child support agency. David owns a £500,000 house in North London, a £3000 race horse, and still has a few coppers left over to take part in some modest pheasant-shooting and stag and fox hunting.
Things worked out well for the father able to leave both the mothers of his children and run off with his best friends wife
well met by moonlight oh Horatio